Close



Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    FEP Member darkwriter77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Apache Junction, AZ
    Posts
    342

    Default Duals vs. Single 3" vs. Single 2.5" on CFI

    Been trying to decide whether it's even worth the hassle/expense of converting my '84 CFI Fox to duals, so I'm considering alternatives. This is my DD, not my weekend toy, so I don't plan to do any major mods to it in the future like heads or anything else, and I plan to keep it CFI for the sake of fuel economy and general drivability. I'd just like to uncork the exhaust a bit to hopefully give the thing a little more pep (maybe even improve the fuel economy just a tad, if it allows it to run more efficiently) and to give the thing some better sound - right now, it sounds exactly like a friggin' stock late-80's Crown Vic.

    1. Is there any performance difference between duals and a 3" single exhaust?

    2. Aside from a couple of minor upgrades (electric fan with 3G upgrade, drop-in K&N filter, bumped timing), on an otherwise stock CFI motor, would I even NEED to go with a 3" exhaust, or would a single 2.5" exhaust be sufficient?

    3. If I do go with a 3" exhaust, would I need to have an entirely new exhaust made from the header flanges back, or could I use the existing downpipes (I'm assuming they're 2.5" on both sides?) and have a muffler shop merge them into a new 3" single pipe?

    4. Anyone got any pics of their single exhaust setups on Foxes?

    Mucho thanks in advance.
    1986 GMC S-15 ext. cab 2.8 - DAILY BEATER.

    1989 Mustang LX 5.0 notch - T-5, 4.10, alum. DS, KC clutch, Pro 5.0 shifter, O/R-X and Violator cat-back, A/C delete - WEEKEND TOY.

  2. #2
    FEP Power Member Hemlock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Quartz Hill, California
    Posts
    2,230
    1984 RS 347 Capri, To many car parts to list, check out my car build page here for the story on my car and a full parts list/setup!:

    My RS in Action

  3. #3

    Default

    My LTD LX has a 1991 mustang roller motor, 1985 Mustang 2.5" tubular exhaust manifolds with heat risers, a 1985 Mustang 2.5" dual y pipe that has been converted from a 2.5" single to a 3" single. It then has 3" single all the way to the back with a Dynomax ultraflo 3" in and 3" out muffler with a 2.5" dual tip that looks factory. I also added a late 1985 Mustang computer.

    It's louder than my 85 Mustang and it's 86+ true dual conversion with Ultraflo mufflers and 2.5" cat back system.
    Last edited by Marz; 03-14-2009 at 10:30 PM.
    1985 Mustang GT Mild 331 4bbl 5 spd, 1985 SEFI LTD LX AOD.
    Cardomain: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/565542
    Mid Size LTD LX Facebook page! http://www.facebook.com/groups/233213650060739/

  4. #4
    FEP Member darkwriter77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Apache Junction, AZ
    Posts
    342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hemlock View Post
    Cool. So, according to that, a 2.5" single exhaust should be about all that I really need, given my limited plans for this car.

    Quote Originally Posted by Marz View Post
    My LTD LX has a 1991 mustang roller motor, 1985 Mustang 2.5" tubular exhaust manifolds with heat risers, a 1985 Mustang 2.5" dual y pipe that has been converted from a 2.5" single to a 3" single. It then has 3" single all the way to the back with a Dynomax ultraflo 3" in and 3" out muffler with a 2.5" dual tip that looks factory. I also added a late 1985 Mustang computer.

    It's louder than my 85 Mustang and it's 86+ true dual conversion with Ultraflo mufflers and 2.5" cat back system.
    Cool. With the restrictive heads and CFI intake I'll still have on mine, and from what the above chart lists, I think 3" would be overkill in my case. I'm thinking a single 2.5" Magnaflow going out to a single 2.5" LX-style tail would be okay. I'd just have to have an exhaust shop bend up a better Y-pipe, or maybe find one from an '85 model (I've got a double-hump crossmember on hand, FWIW), before I could do anything else with it.

    Cool deal, then. Just outta curiosity, do you have any pics of your setup?
    1986 GMC S-15 ext. cab 2.8 - DAILY BEATER.

    1989 Mustang LX 5.0 notch - T-5, 4.10, alum. DS, KC clutch, Pro 5.0 shifter, O/R-X and Violator cat-back, A/C delete - WEEKEND TOY.

  5. #5

    Default

    I'm also going the 2.5" single exhaust route ... for the Y-pipe, i'll just modify a used off-road X-pipe i have laying around but cutting and weld shut its passenger exit ... this will give a better, i think, gaz flow than the pre-85 (don't know the shape of the '85) factory Y-pipe. Off course, i change exhaust manifolds to shorties too.
    '79 Pace Car 5.0 (well 4.2 until better days)
    '80 Capri 2.3 (sold ) - '79 Hatchback 2.3 (sold ) - '80 Notchback 3.3 (junk yard )

  6. #6
    FEP Power Member Hemlock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Quartz Hill, California
    Posts
    2,230

    Default

    The stock 84 RS 5.0 Capri with the HO motor came factory with a Y pipe to single 2.5 exhaust all the way out the back with a duel exhaust tip(at least mine did) and it would be a direct fit for your car Dark if you could find one in a junkyard somewhere.

    Just a thought,
    Robert
    1984 RS 347 Capri, To many car parts to list, check out my car build page here for the story on my car and a full parts list/setup!:

    My RS in Action

  7. #7
    FEP Member darkwriter77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Apache Junction, AZ
    Posts
    342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hemlock View Post
    The stock 84 RS 5.0 Capri with the HO motor came factory with a Y pipe to single 2.5 exhaust all the way out the back with a duel exhaust tip(at least mine did) and it would be a direct fit for your car Dark if you could find one in a junkyard somewhere.

    Just a thought,
    Robert
    True. I'm just thinking that it would be a slight improvement to have a shop bend up some fresh 2.5" pipe after the downpipes because that one going across from the driver's side to the passenger's side before it Y's into the cat is WAY smooshed by design (it's almost half-flat where it passes under the tranny) ... unless the other HO Y-pipes were a bit different and less restrictive. I think, if nothing else, I could probably buy an OEM replacement Y-pipe from Dynomax that would be less crimped and smooshed and then bolt up basically one half of a standard cat-back kit on there.

    I should crawl under my car and snap pictures sometime. The stock system is friggin' horrible the way it's set up. And WTF is that stupid vacuum-actuated valve doing on the driver's side exhaust manifold, anyway? I have a set of 87+ headers sitting in my closet that I'd throw on there while I'm at it, if I knew they would bolt up to a stock Y-pipe...
    1986 GMC S-15 ext. cab 2.8 - DAILY BEATER.

    1989 Mustang LX 5.0 notch - T-5, 4.10, alum. DS, KC clutch, Pro 5.0 shifter, O/R-X and Violator cat-back, A/C delete - WEEKEND TOY.

  8. #8
    FEP Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Kalamazoo, Michigan
    Posts
    3,020

    Default

    Is the fuel for this debate weighing originality vs performance? IMO I'd just get a double hump crossmember, and a new h pipe, and run true duals all the way out. Nothing looks better on these cars to me than a set of OE 2.25 polished stainless pipes.
    Former Foxes:
    1983 Fairmont Futura 4dr
    1986 Mustang LX 2.3 4 speed
    1985 Mustang GT
    1985 GT - 357w, T5, 8.8 w/ 4.10's.
    Best ET 13.5639, Best Mph 102.39
    1988 LX 5.0 AOD notch, bone stock no options except A/C
    1980 Mercury Capri RS Turbo, 50k mile survivor.
    1987 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe....ratty but fun.
    1992 Mustang GT convertible 85k from original owner

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darkwriter77 View Post
    True. I'm just thinking that it would be a slight improvement to have a shop bend up some fresh 2.5" pipe after the downpipes because that one going across from the driver's side to the passenger's side before it Y's into the cat is WAY smooshed by design (it's almost half-flat where it passes under the tranny) ... unless the other HO Y-pipes were a bit different and less restrictive. I think, if nothing else, I could probably buy an OEM replacement Y-pipe from Dynomax that would be less crimped and smooshed and then bolt up basically one half of a standard cat-back kit on there.

    I should crawl under my car and snap pictures sometime. The stock system is friggin' horrible the way it's set up. And WTF is that stupid vacuum-actuated valve doing on the driver's side exhaust manifold, anyway? I have a set of 87+ headers sitting in my closet that I'd throw on there while I'm at it, if I knew they would bolt up to a stock Y-pipe...
    The 85 Roller HO's and the late 85 CFI HO's had a much better exhaust. As said... The 85 tubular exhaust manifolds had a 2 1/2" collector to 2 1/2" duals to a 2.5" single, through a cat then split again to 2 1/4" duals.

    Even just grabbing the 85 (4 into one) tubular exhaust manifolds and y-pipe and then have a shop finish the job with a 2 1/2" single to the rear with a nice looking dual tip would look stock.
    1985 Mustang GT Mild 331 4bbl 5 spd, 1985 SEFI LTD LX AOD.
    Cardomain: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/565542
    Mid Size LTD LX Facebook page! http://www.facebook.com/groups/233213650060739/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •