Close



Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Default Non-Oxygentated 91 or Ethanl 87?

    I just put a newly rebuilt carburetor on my car and am going to start this weekend...which got me thinking..."Should I be running non-oxygenated gas to avoid any gumming up problems I read about with the ethanol gas that is pretty much all that's available in Minnesota?

    If I go to non-oxygenated, pretty much all I can seem to find is 91 octane which I understand is not ideal power-wise for our lower compression engines.

    With that in mind and knowing I need to store the car 6 months of the year in Minnesota, is it better to run 87octane 10% ethanol gas or 91octane non-oxygenated?

  2. #2
    FEP Power Member richpet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Lowell, Oregon
    Posts
    2,138

    Default

    Just stay with 87 octane. Sure, the alcohol can eventually gum it up. Just drive it. For insurance feel free to use an additive like Startron or similar
    The ethanol mainly causes an issue if it sits for too long.
    Perfect example:
    I purchased a 2000 Honda Goldwing GL1500SE in 2002. Last year for carbs (it had two). Those carbs were FINICKY due to very small passages - almost as precise as fuel injection. I put almost 130,000 miles on it in 15 years, never once had a carb issue. But, low mileage riders had them comparably common. Why? The ethanol fuel never sat for more than a few days.
    I ran a can of Seafoam through it once a year is all. Still ran like a sewing machine when it got totaled (I got rear ended).
    Extra octane when not needed hurts a lot more than helps.
    Fill it with clear in the fall for winter storage, or use a stabilizer.

    Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
    83 5.0 GT. Quicker than it looks! 10:1 (or just over) 306, Motorsport a332 cam, 140A alt, t5 conv, 8.8 w/ 3.27's, Edel rpm, alum rad, very worked e7's, Holley SA carb, etc... SOLD IT!!!!

    Now an 1981 Granada! .040 over 302, Edel E-street heads... Currently building a 347 because, why not?

    "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups"

  3. #3
    Moderator wraithracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Grand Junction, CO/RR TX
    Posts
    14,209

    Default

    Other than the added cost for no real performance benefit, there's nothing wrong with running 91 Ethanol free in an engine designed for 87 or 89. Using a higher octane won't cause damage or cause issues with the engine.

    As stated if the vehicle sits for long periods in between drives and/or it takes long periods to use an entire tank of fuel, then I would recommend using the NON Ethanol fuel. It will stay fresh longer and ultimate be a better choice to prevent further maintenance issues and costs. Personally I would rather spend a little extra for the NON Ethanol fuel than adding a fuel stabilizer to the Ethanol fuel to try and make it last.

    If you are daily driving the vehicle and going thru a tank of fuel on a weekly, bi-weekly basis then using fuel with Ethanol will work just fine. I would highly recommend running a tank of Ethanol free through the vehicle before winter storage and then top off the tank again with Ethanol free. Good Luck!
    ​Trey

    "I Don't build it hoping for your approval! I built it because it meets mine!"

    "I've spent most of my money on Mustangs, racing, and women... the rest I just wasted."

    Mustangs Past: Too many to remember!
    Current Mustangs:
    1969 Mach 1
    1979 Pace Car now 5.0/5 speed
    1982 GT Stalled RestoModification
    1984 SVO Still Waiting Restoration
    1986 GT Under going Wide Body Conversion Currently

    Current Capris:
    1981 Capri Roller
    1981 Capri Black Magic Roller Basket Case
    1982 Capri RS 5.0/4spd T-top Full Restoration Stalled in TX
    1984 Capri RS T-top Roller
    1983-84 Gloy Racing Trans Am/IMSA Body Parts

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •