Close



Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    FEP Super Member erratic50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    4,575

    Default Lowering the center of gravity by alternate design

    Anyone ever stopped and deeply thought about stuff like center of gravity of a vehicle. Not ride height but more about where the weight is and how close to the ground the center of that mass actually is

    Look at a V8. Where is the most weight by far? On top...... V

    Now think about this from another perspective — hot air rises and yet we pull the air in from the top and put the exhaust out the bottom.

    What if someone would design a setup where a V8 engine is basically ran upside down? Think about how much lower the center of gravity would be.

    Yea .... there are problems to overcome to do it. Even the suspension stuff is all solvable ....

    Trans is pretty easy — it shouldn’t be too hard to spin a T5 on the bellhousing to keep the rest of stuff “normal”.

    The first thing to think about after the oiling and cooling stuff is motor mounts but those shouldn’t be particularly hard.

    The main down side might be when someone decides that motors have to come out from the bottom like a damn bug but hey, whatever works.

  2. #2
    FEP Senior Member dtmilsap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Rose Hill,Kansas
    Posts
    895

    Default

    Never thought of turning engine upside down, now lets see if someone can do a mid engine fox.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    FEP Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    New Boston, MI
    Posts
    314

    Default

    Aluminum heads and intake do a lot to reduce weight up top


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    FEP Member 86MustangGtRob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mississauga Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    432

    Default

    On a rear engine car it would be easier to have the exhaust exit out of the top. In the 60's, some of the Grand prix cars had the exhaust come out on top of the motor. They had it exit where the valley of the v configuration. To get our cars to have a better center of gravity. We would have to lower our engine closer to the ground. Lately I have been thinking about getting my 85 have more of the weight lower in the car.

  5. #5
    Moderator wraithracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Grand Junction, CO/RR TX
    Posts
    14,210

    Default

    Doesn't change the actual V design of the engine, but in the Ford 6.7L Scorpion Diesel engine they reversed the intake and exhaust design. Intake air on the outside of the heads and the exhaust is in the center. Cut down on Y pipes and exhaust tubing to flow everything into the Turbo.

    I don't see a real efficient way to flip a V8 without oiling issues just due to gravity alone. Dry sump would be a necessity at that point, but would have to think more about it and finish my coffee to have any better ideas this morning.
    ​Trey

    "I Don't build it hoping for your approval! I built it because it meets mine!"

    "I've spent most of my money on Mustangs, racing, and women... the rest I just wasted."

    Mustangs Past: Too many to remember!
    Current Mustangs:
    1969 Mach 1
    1979 Pace Car now 5.0/5 speed
    1982 GT Stalled RestoModification
    1984 SVO Still Waiting Restoration
    1986 GT Under going Wide Body Conversion Currently

    Current Capris:
    1981 Capri Roller
    1981 Capri Black Magic Roller Basket Case
    1982 Capri RS 5.0/4spd T-top Full Restoration Stalled in TX
    1984 Capri RS T-top Roller
    1983-84 Gloy Racing Trans Am/IMSA Body Parts

  6. #6
    FEP Super Member erratic50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    4,575

    Default

    Dry sump would be the easy way. There are still issues to solve.

  7. #7
    FEP Senior Member BMW Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    950

    Default

    I think it would be simpler to engineer a new design engine from scratch for inverted operation than it would be to try to make an existing north american V8 work inverted.

    The simplest way to lower the CG is to lower the entire car. Next would be to use polycarbonate in place of all the heavy glass. This is one of the reasons SUVs are typically top heavy and prone to roll over, lots of glass and a tall stance.

  8. #8
    FEP Power Member gmatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago, south subs
    Posts
    2,136

    Default

    I think you would have a hard time getting the crank centerline low enough with an inverted v. Boxer engines lower the heads and cylinder bores significantly.

  9. #9
    FEP Power Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Lancaster, ca
    Posts
    2,242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gmatt View Post
    I think you would have a hard time getting the crank centerline low enough with an inverted v. Boxer engines lower the heads and cylinder bores significantly.
    I was thinking that too. Looks like the only flat 8 engines ever made were all air cooled. Even then, they've only been used in racing and airplanes.


  10. #10
    FEP Super Member erratic50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    4,575

    Default

    Flat 8 is a cool concept.

    I agree that a clean slate would be easier

    i also agree it would be challenging to get it “low enough”

    but look at the average FWD car. Now look at how low that design could carry an inverted V. Now sort the rest from there.......

    I think it would be COOL.

  11. #11
    FEP Senior Member FuturaGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Windsor, CT
    Posts
    835

    Default

    Check out the inverted V-12 on the Messerschmidt 109 from World War II or an inverted Ranger aircraft engine. Both had to have oil scavenge pumps to return the oil from the valve train back to the sump.

    Equally important as lowering the center of gravity of a vehicle is raising the instantaneous roll center, which is determined by the suspension pivot points. There are practical reasons that limit the height of the instantaneous roll center (suspension geometry, change of camber angle, etc.) but if it were possible to have the center of gravity beneath the instantaneous roll center, a car would lean INTO a curve instead of outward as cars do now.

  12. #12
    FEP Super Member erratic50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    4,575

    Default

    Interesting info about inverted V aircraft

    https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/thread...-engine.29473/

  13. #13
    FEP Power Member richpet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Lowell, Oregon
    Posts
    2,138

    Default

    Fun to think about anyway. Concept is cool. Making it reality an involved deal.

    Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
    83 5.0 GT. Quicker than it looks! 10:1 (or just over) 306, Motorsport a332 cam, 140A alt, t5 conv, 8.8 w/ 3.27's, Edel rpm, alum rad, very worked e7's, Holley SA carb, etc... SOLD IT!!!!

    Now an 1981 Granada! .040 over 302, Edel E-street heads... Currently building a 347 because, why not?

    "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups"

  14. #14

    Default

    Here is center of gravity about as low as you can get with a conventional V design. These things don't come up to my hip joint. 3 generations of GT40.

    Name:  TRIO.jpg
Views: 57
Size:  138.5 KB
    W

    As always, "It ain't what you don't know that gets you, it's what you think you know that just ain't so."

  15. #15
    FEP Power Member Broncojunkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Barboursville, WV
    Posts
    1,779

    Default

    Just think how easy the oil filter change would be... not to mention fixing that pesky oil pan gasket!
    79 Pace Car - 331, t5
    79 Pace Car- 302, 4 spd
    79 Cobra - working on 351w, t5
    82 Capri- working on 302, t5
    82gt - working on 408w, c4

  16. #16
    FEP Super Member erratic50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    4,575

    Default

    Somehow the damn oil pan still has to be on the bottom ..... lols

  17. #17
    FEP Power Member Broncojunkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Barboursville, WV
    Posts
    1,779

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erratic50 View Post
    Somehow the damn oil pan still has to be on the bottom ..... lols
    79 Pace Car - 331, t5
    79 Pace Car- 302, 4 spd
    79 Cobra - working on 351w, t5
    82 Capri- working on 302, t5
    82gt - working on 408w, c4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •