Close



Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1

    Default A little drama 5-speed

    I know it's been kicked around some, so here I go.
    I have a low mile Thunderbird 3.8 SC 5-speed trans and 11" clutch that I want to install on my 5.0.
    I know I will need 164 tooth late model flywheel 50oz balancer, clutch cable conversion, release/throughout, pilot bearing
    This is going into a 1979 Hatchback V-8. What else might I encounter with this upgrade?
    Thanks
    Ed

    Name:  DSCF0065.jpg
Views: 219
Size:  105.2 KB
    Name:  DSCF0066.jpg
Views: 219
Size:  114.8 KB
    Name:  m trans.jpg
Views: 134
Size:  53.4 KB
    Last edited by ThunderStruck; 04-25-2018 at 08:48 PM.

  2. #2
    FEP Power Member gmatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago, south subs
    Posts
    2,136

    Default

    trans mount? speedometer? How does the shift lever placement compare to the stock set-up?

  3. #3

    Default

    Might as well just throw a sn-95 t-5 out of a v-6. It bolts in place, is cheap and readily available.

    The shifter is setup for a truck, literally. How the truck shifter relates to a t-5, I don't know. I'd checkout t-5 swaps on supercoupe and see where they end up, should give ya a good idea.

    When I used an 11" setup, I used f-150 stuff, clutch pressure plate flywheel and everything. The m5od trans used a hydraulic clutch. The only fox hydraulic clutch pedal setup I know of is the 87-88 turbo coupe. Not sure how different the dash is on the early cars though.
    2 1986 cougars (both 4 eyed and 5.0)
    1 1987 cougar

  4. #4

    Default

    I don't know much about this swap, but it looks like a lot of work and problems to overcome.

    The T-5 uses a slip yoke. Does that trans? If it doesn't, a solid drive shaft will not work.
    That trans looks like it use an electric signal for the speedometer. Your Stang uses a cable driven speedometer.
    You would be best off to find a hydraulic master kit for a Fox Body and make a custom line for the slave cylinder.
    That trans looks much longer that the T-5, and shifter placement might be a consideration.
    Does the 3.8 have the same bell housing pattern as a 302?
    Fabricating a cross member will be a concern.

    This is stuff just at first glance. The swap will be a lot of work, and in the long run you might be better off looking at other options.

  5. #5
    FEP Senior Member BMW Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    950

    Default

    The 79 engine will be a 28 oz balance so you can't use the 50 oz parts on it. You will have to find a later engine that is a 50 oz balance if that is the only flywheel that is compatible to the transmission. Mixing the two will result in destructive vibrations.

  6. #6
    FEP Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    725

    Default

    When you find out let me know. I have three or four of these transmissions and one will eventually end up in my wagon. I've started collecting the hydraulic clutch pedal parts from a TC. I haven't checked out the difference between the SC clutch master and the TC clutch master bore sizes and pedal stroke. I do have a set of SC clutch pedals with the clutch master in my garage if you need any info from that.

    Everybody says the shifter will be too far back for a Fox. I swear I've measured it on my car several times and it looks like it would be almost perfect. The centerline of the shifter is about 30-1/2" inches back from the front face of the bellhousing. I need to crawl under there and get some better measurements though.

    You will find that nobody has any love for this transmission, but they are pretty stout. There is a reason they used this behind the torquey SC engine in the heavier MN12 chassis rather than the T-5. Most everyone knocks it because of its truck heritage. The transmissions in my '95 SC and '89 XR7 have always shifted well.

    I do not know about the SBF and V6 flywheel issues. I don't see why there would be an issue running the proper flywheel for the engine application though. I run a Centerforce Dual Friction clutch in the Cougar and a Centerforce Gold in the SC. I don't think they (Centerforce) makes a clutch for the later model cars anymore. I've been happy with both.

    The 3.8 does have the same bellhousing pattern as the SBF. It does use a VSS to feed the speedo so you will have to figure that out. It does use a slip yoke like the T-5, but you will probably have to alter the driveshaft length.
    '89 XR-7 5 Speed
    '95 SC 5 Speed
    '91 Crown Vic P72 351W
    '97 Thunderbird
    '85 Ford LTD Squire

  7. #7

    Default

    I have a worked 1987 5.0 engine ready to go.
    Last edited by ThunderStruck; 04-26-2018 at 07:11 PM.

  8. #8

    Default

    Its the same length and everything. Slip yoke same style clutch. Throw a 86ish 351w flywheel in for an f-150 and have at it.
    2 1986 cougars (both 4 eyed and 5.0)
    1 1987 cougar

  9. #9

    Default

    If the vss is geared instead of a magnetic pick up, the stock Speedo will swap right in.
    2 1986 cougars (both 4 eyed and 5.0)
    1 1987 cougar

  10. #10

    Default

    Thanks Guys,
    Today I got engine and trans unbolted, tomorrow I should know more...
    Ed
    Last edited by ThunderStruck; 04-26-2018 at 07:18 PM. Reason: me

  11. #11

    Default

    Good luck man, let us know how it goes.
    2 1986 cougars (both 4 eyed and 5.0)
    1 1987 cougar

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •