qwertz, this ones for you....
US 2.8 cams as recomended by EthylCat
See the previous two posts. I trust and engine builder with some engine analysing experience.
http://vb.foureyedpride.com/showthre...-options/page2
http://www.therangerstation.com/tech...rformance.html
http://www.burtonpower.com/tuning-gu...ing-guide.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIWJ5mywo1I
Ford Performance Article above is wrong in many instances...in an about the mid sixites, the 7 "litre" 500 Galaxie was the first US Ford to use the French "Liter" measure
And the platform sharing of the Mustang and Falcon...yes, the dash, cowl and pressings were internally interchangble, but it was a short wheel base Fairline with less than fairlane and greater than Falcon tracks, the Pinto and Mustang II shared steering and brakes and engines and modified Pinto floor pan pressings...
http://www.fordpinto.com/your-projec...lacement-pans/
[img]
[/img]
The rest of the car, as was said, was a home run. Here's why...
The Fox took the same turret parameters (its interior and cowl and and narrow width hood and cat walk were pretty much Ford Mustang II), and
the European Cortina Coil spring rear end, Cortina/Taunas Two door hard dimensions of steering rack, lower front coil springs, wheel base, track width,
and mashed it up with the right kind of wheel arch space and great US Fairmont Fox hard dimensions...
Four Eyed Foxers owe their all to the Mustang II.
Connect With Us