Close



Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    FEP Super Member cb84capri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    lansing, mi
    Posts
    4,667

    Default Intake manifold coolant crossover

    What is the deal with Edelbrock deleting the rear coolant crossover on their intake manifolds? My thought is that Ford put it there for a reason. My 347 is nearing completion, and the more I think about it, the more inclined I am to put my Professional Products Typhoon back on instead of my Edelbrock Performer RPM Airgap. Thoughts?

    Thanks,
    Cale

  2. #2

    Default

    not to sure but my weiend stealth also has them blocked off
    1983 Mustang gt-t-tops,5.0,4spd,all original
    1983 Mustang GT -sunroof 5.0 5sp, work in progress.
    2003 Cobra - 2.8 pulley, headers, o/r xpipe,flowmaster cat back, bf irs brace, h&r race springs, mmcc. SOLD
    2002 Mustang GT - Lt headers,o/r hpipe,slp2 catback,4.10 gears,cai, pro 5.0 shifter,sct2 tune. SOLD
    2001 Focus zx3 - Daily Driver
    1988 Bronco XLT - 5.0 -Sold
    1983 Mustang GT - (my first car) sunroof, 306,srod 4sp, 3.55 gears, Lt headers, o/r hpipe, flowmaster catback. SOLD

  3. #3
    FEP Member brianj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Raymond, New Hampshire
    Posts
    2,896
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Apparently, it's not needed as much on a vehicle such as ours, where we are willing to accept slower warm up times than a production car. Thousands of these intakes run like this with no problems. Even my blower manifold, Made by Weiand, eliminated the rear crossover.
    1983 Mustang G.T. No-option stripper- I like strippers.
    5.0, GT40P heads, Comp Cams XE270HR-12 on 1.6 rockers, TFI spring kit, Weiand 174 blower, Holley 750 mechanical secondarys, Mishimoto radiator, Edelbrock street performer mechanical pump, BBK shortys, T-5 conversion, 8.8 rear, 3.73 gears, carbon fiber clutches, SS Machine lowers, Maximum Motorsport XL subframes, "B" springs.

  4. #4
    FEP Super Member cb84capri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    lansing, mi
    Posts
    4,667

    Default

    On my car, it seemed the intake temperature ran rampant without the rear cross over. It doesn't seem to care about the RPM manifold being an air gap intake at all, it boils the fuel like that's its job. I think (at least) the rear cross over keeps the manifold temperature from getting out of control because I didn't have problems to this degree with the Typhoon in place. It seems like a half ass'd way of doing things to me.

    Cale

  5. #5
    FEP Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Lake City Pa 16423
    Posts
    510

    Default

    If you look at, and think about how the water flows through an engine, you will understand it better. Water exits the pump on the front into both sides of the block. It then travels through the block to the rear. Once there it then moves up into the heads, that's why the head gaskets have to go on the right way, the water port in the gasket goes to the back of the block. Then the water flows to the front of the heads into the cross over in the intake, then exit the thermostat housing. Now if there is a water passage in the back of the block, it will only cross over if there is an imbalance of flow through the heads, and may even add to one side over heating or cooling too much. If the flow through the blocks and heads are even, than the rear cross over won't even matter.
    And for some who might point out, there are smaller passages in the head gasket that allows water to flow up into the heads as well, those are steam holes. Meant to let air bubbles out, not meant as a passage for main cooling flow.

  6. #6
    FEP Super Member cb84capri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    lansing, mi
    Posts
    4,667

    Default

    What I think is that the coolant sits in the cross over, and is continually cooled by the water flowing past it. I think if a flow variance did exist, it would balance it out and keep both heads running closer in temperature. I can't help but think that if Ford had any reason to eliminate it they would have. Seems to me it would be one less thing to worry about in the manufacturing process. My carburetor fuel boiling issues got worse after installing the Air gap RPM intake that doesn't have a rear cross over in it.

    Cale

  7. #7
    FEP Super Member bwguardian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Houston (Clear Lake), Texas
    Posts
    4,669

    Default

    My Ford Racing intake manifold does not have the rear cross over. I have a heat shield and phenolic spacer under the carb and have had no issues.
    HAD
    '82 GT monochromatic (red)...black cloth

    HAVE
    '85 GT vert two tone (white on charcoal)...white leather
    '00 F350 two tone (white on silver)...gray cloth
    '00 Excursion Limited two tone (white on tan)...tan leather...wifes ride
    '08 Taurus Limited ice blue...tan leather...daughter ride
    '08 Edge Limited white sand tri-coat metallic...tan leather...other daughters ride

  8. #8
    FEP Super Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Roseburg Oregon
    Posts
    3,308

    Default

    I have never had carb boiling problems with my Edelbrock manifold , even when spraying a 250 shot of nitrous.

    That is much more demanding , than any street driving conditions .
    I think you are over thinking it.
    clowns to the left of me , Jokers to the right

  9. #9

    Default

    The early small blocks did not have a rear coolant crossover in the intake manifold. Ford added it later when they needed more holes for sensors. If you don't have any sensors plugged into the rear passage then you don't need it.

  10. #10
    FEP Super Member cb84capri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    lansing, mi
    Posts
    4,667

    Default

    I run an AFB carb, the fuel bowls do not hang off the side like they do on a Holley so they are more susceptible to these problems. If I can keep the toilet bowl flushing the thing will run like crazy all day. I guess I really am my own worst enemy with this problem, if I ditched the dual snorkel and put a spacer under it and a smaller open element to clear the hood I'm sure this would be a lot better. My heat soak issues happen when stopped in traffic, when the car is restarted after running, at the drag strip if I try to hot lap it, etc. If I go out to soon at the track I go to launch, and bahhhhhh falls right on its face when I let off the clutch, get to go wait in the pits for about 40 min until it cools down enough to go back out. I put a cool can on it before I threw the crank out of the block earlier this year the problems were that bad after the manifold switch. The coolant temperature only gets up to about 200 in traffic when the fuel boils. Tried to do the Woodward Dream Cruise last year and it stopped running entirely the gas got so hot, and I got to push it down the street. I wish I had a big old nitrous bottle to spray at the carb so it would cool down enough to run. I have done the Dream Cruise in this car before with the Typhoon on it with no drama.

    Cale

  11. #11
    FEP Super Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Roseburg Oregon
    Posts
    3,308

    Default

    Ever thought of going to a Holley ?
    clowns to the left of me , Jokers to the right

  12. #12
    FEP Super Member cb84capri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    lansing, mi
    Posts
    4,667

    Default

    I have, but the Edelbrock holds its tune so well and does everything air fuel ratio wise so well everywhere for me I don't want to. I'm not much a fan of the potential for fuel bowl leaks with the Holleys. I know with a Holley I could probably run faster at the track, but I have decided this is more of a street car anyways. I may experiment in the future with one, though.

    Cale

  13. #13
    FEP Power Member grtskydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Carolina Beach, NC
    Posts
    1,567

    Default

    You could also try the Summit carb. 1-pc body like an Eddy, but with conventional Holley parts. The design is a knockoff of a Holley knockoff of the old Autolites. I ran one for awhile when I had my 302 in and it was a neat carb. That said, I've run Holley, Eddy and the Summit...even messed with a Quick Fuel at the pinnacle of my carb-tuning adventures. Tried heat shields, phenolic spacers, and everything in between. All junk in the attic now. Never was able to solve my percolation issues.
    Ed

    "The Dude abides."

  14. #14
    FEP Super Member cb84capri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    lansing, mi
    Posts
    4,667

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by grtskydog View Post
    You could also try the Summit carb. 1-pc body like an Eddy, but with conventional Holley parts. The design is a knockoff of a Holley knockoff of the old Autolites. I ran one for awhile when I had my 302 in and it was a neat carb. That said, I've run Holley, Eddy and the Summit...even messed with a Quick Fuel at the pinnacle of my carb-tuning adventures. Tried heat shields, phenolic spacers, and everything in between. All junk in the attic now. Never was able to solve my percolation issues.
    I remember your write-up about that carb many moons ago, I remember how bad your Professional Products intake manifold was too when you initially went efi. I was half expecting to be called crazy by you when I saw your screen name for the last post, haha! I may have to look you up on some of the parts if you'd like to sell them.

    A note on my cars performance while I'm at this... With the 302 the car went 13.6s @ 102 with 3.55s drinking oil on #4 cylinder because of a failed lowly printoseal intake gasket with the ported Typhoon when it decided to launch. Car went 13.3 @ 102 with 4.10s not drinking oil with the ported RPM air gap all day long as the only changes. The Air Gap has smaller ports then the Typhoon and I had to open the ports up a lot more to match my heads. 1/8 trap speed was higher with 4.10 switch but the car wasn't picking up 24mph from the 1/8 to the 1/4 anymore. I think I lost performance with the manifold switch considering the severity of the oil leak, though admittedly not the best comparison. All things considered, I decided to put the Typhoon on my new motor.

    Cale

  15. #15
    FEP Super Member cb84capri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    lansing, mi
    Posts
    4,667

    Default

    Got some driving in tonight. I did all the stuff that the car hated when the RPM Airgap was on it, and the Typhoon didn't give me anywhere near the amount of issues that one did. If I iced the cool can I likely would not have had any hiccups. Aside from the engine being a 347 now, the only other notable differences are bigger needles and seats in the same carb, and 2 carb flange gaskets are being used. We'll see what happens when the hot weather comes.

    Cale

  16. #16

    Default

    I deleted my crossover to eliminate the risk of coolant leaking and being sucked into the manifold.

    Sent from my 5017B using Tapatalk

  17. #17
    FEP Power Member grtskydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Carolina Beach, NC
    Posts
    1,567

    Default

    I think one of the original purposes of the rear crossover was for OE stuff. Remember the 'ol Thermal Vacuum Switch? They had to have a place to mount stuff like that and sensors in some applications. I had an old Stealth that had the rear passage, and I liked it since I was using the TVS with my vacuum advance. My only guess is the a/m intakes that are mild upgrades allow for use of the OE sensors/switches, while with the hotter intakes they figure you've already ditched all that stuff.
    Ed

    "The Dude abides."

  18. #18
    FEP Super Member xctasy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Dunedin 9011, New Zealand, South Pacific
    Posts
    3,961

    Default

    Same issue over here in Australian 188 hp 4V 302 Fords. No space, even with the cross over on a Cleveland. They mounted them in a second water neck hole, ie two holes on the gooseneck. There was a third whole for another manifold vac at the back


    Two red TVS's for-ard if it had optional York A/C pump emissions package.




    One at the back of the intake, angled below the rear mounted EGR.





    If it was stick shift and manual, 302 or 351, it got this.



    Manifold vac, angled down at back via cross over.


    Cale, I vote some BSP fittings, a good diameter "oval"-ed with a press or some hammer work 3/4" copper line and make your own adaptor.

    Frank Zappa was a plumber!

    The I6 1980-1983 3.3 Junction block works as well, its an easy hookup. Junction = Junk Yard, a little word association....




    Quote Originally Posted by JACook View Post
    A ported vacuum switch that's in the water outlet will only see actual coolant temperature when
    the thermostat is open. A ported vacuum switch that's rated to switch at 125F-130F can't
    do it's job as well when it's sitting on the other side of a device that opens at ~190F. A bleed
    orifice in the thermostat would help, but it's just better to have it in constant contact with the
    coolant inside the engine.

    One possible solution is to use a heater hose elbow that has provision for an ECT sensor, and
    put the PVS there. Fox HVAC systems do not have a valve that turns off coolant flow in the
    heater loop, so a PVS there would work fine.


    A PVS that is intended to raise idle speed when the engine cooant is over 225F can do it's job
    when it's sitting on the other side of the thermostat, because at 225F, that thermostat had
    better be open. It could also do it's job screwed into a manifold coolant passage, but what
    to do if you don't have any of those ports available is probably why it's commonly found in
    a water outlet. Those PVSs were in use back in '68, when manifolds had fewer places to put
    one than they do now.
    Ford used the angled goose neck from day 1 for a TVS valve...that's why they went to the Clevelands,M's, 400's and Lima ThundaJet "385" engines...for easier emissions plumbing.

    Use the "transferable, relocatable" E0 to E3 Ford I6 part, (like what JA Cokk suggested above) and lock it under the plug wires and run it flat through the water line before the thermostat. It allows you to run the Spark Delay or whatever the 84's ran.

    Here's the master list from the 85 manual





    verses whatever you might find on the busted a$$ 80'six





    http://i1215.photobucket.com/albums/...201981_DCK.jpg


    Here's the part again.





    And Red78' breakout codes from his files (with my numbers...sometimes Ford likes to add VCV and VLV, TAD/TAB to the list from 1979, and not tell anyone but trained Ford Service Techs, so a little work finding the best of the 74 ding-a lings below is needed. FoMoCo doesn't use the PCV label, and there are IMCO and other terms for the common items which might not be the best descriptions.

    1 A/CL: according to Ford, that IS the air cleaner
    2 A/CL DV: Air Cleaner Duct & Valve
    3 A/CL BI MET: Air Cleaner Bi-Metallic Valve
    4 A/CL CWM: Air Cleaner Cold Weather Modulator
    5 ACV: Air Control Valve
    6 AIR: This is a Secondary air injection Ford calls the Thermactor, short for Thermal Reactor. CA vehicles are installed with it as standard. Air Injection Reaction is what it stands for.
    The thermactor system consists mainly of the air pump, the air pump diverter and bypass valves, TAB and TAD solenoids (if equipped) and the catalytic converter.
    7 AIR BPV: Air Bypass Valve (aka Thermactor Air Bypass TAB)
    8 BV: Bowl Vent (on top of the float tanks)
    9 CARB: Carburetor
    10 CPRV: Canister Purge Valve ( PURGE CV: )
    11 DIST: Distributor of course.
    12 EGR: Exhaust Gas Recirculator
    13 EFCA: Electronic Fuel Control Assymbly
    14 FLTR: Filter
    15 FPR: Fuel Pressure Regulator
    16 IVV: Thermactor Idle Vacuum Valve
    17 MAN VAC: Indicating Manifold vacuum-Vacuum source
    18 MAP: Manifold Absolute Pressure
    19 SOL V: Solenoid Valve
    20 SV-CBV: Carburetor Fuel Bowl Solenoid Vent Valve
    21 VAC: short for Vacuum
    22 VCKV: Vacuum Check Valve
    23 VRESER: Vacuum Reservoir (Actually VRESER just stands for Vacuum Reservoir. It may or may not have a valve or Solenoid Valve inside it.
    24 VREST is a vacuum restriction, usually at the thermally controlled valve on top of the thermostat housing.
    *On 87 4V 460 F250 truck it is a simple blue plastic orifice inline with the vacuum line.
    25 VRV: Vacuum Regulator Valve
    26 VRDV: Vacuum Retard Delay Valve, as these can be used on more than just the distributor.
    27 TVS: Thermal Vacuum Switch, and is different to a Dashpot. On Fords these are usualy located in the air cleaner.
    28 TVV: Thermal Vent Valve. On fords they are mostly controlled by ambient air temps. Simular to a TVS. Located between the carb and the charcoal cannister.
    29 PVS: Ported Vacuum Switch: Very simular to TVVs except on Fords they are used in the cooling system and are controlled by water temps.
    30 PURGE CV: Vapor Canister Purge Valve
    31 EVAP CANISTER ASY
    32 Ford refers to theirs as an Idle Speed Control (ISC) solenoid
    33 Idle Boost Solenoid (Orange Knob on 81, 82, 83 A/C Equiped 3.3's) or Throttle Kicker Control
    34 Carburettor throttle Solenoid Positioner (Anti Dieseling Valve/Idle Stop Solenoid)
    35 Spark Port
    36 EGR Actuator
    37 EGR Port
    38 CAT is catalytic converter;
    39 ENG is engine;
    40 ACT - not sure, but on EFIs it means Air Charge Temperature sensor
    41 Inlet Air Temperature Control
    42 Green DVCV 2 port PVS vaccum switches
    43 Blue TCVV 3 port vaccum switches
    44 Dual Diaphram Distibutor
    45 Black SDV Cold Start Spark Delay valve
    46 Black SDV EGR Vaccuum delay valve
    47 Deceleration Valve (PVS Cold Start lockout Dampened, Non Dashpot)
    48 Non dampened or 2 port PVS (dampened) control EGR
    49 Attitude and Position Fuel Trap
    50 PVS Vacuum with Sintered Line Filters
    51 Close Limit primary or Main Jets,
    52 Lead plug sealed idle screws
    53 Carburettor throttle Solenoid Positioner
    54 Evaporative Emmission Control System
    55 Anti Backfire Valve
    56 EGR Valve Actuator
    57 Vacuum Regulator/Solenoid
    58 Solenoid Valve
    59 Venturi Vacuum Amplifier
    60 Load Control Valve
    61 EGR B/P Transducer
    62 Signal Conditioner
    63 Ported Pressure Switch
    64 Vent Valve Vacuum
    65 Vacuum Controlled Switch
    66 Vacuum Controlled Switch (Cold Temp)
    67 Vacuum Controlled Switch (Decel Idle)
    68 Vacuum Delay Valve
    69 Vacuum Vent Valve
    70 Delay Valve Two Way
    71 Ignition Timing Vacuum Switch
    72 Ignition Pressure Switch
    73 TK (Throttle Kicker)
    74 Mushroom caps for charcoal fuel vapor canister vents.

  19. #19
    FEP Member brianj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Raymond, New Hampshire
    Posts
    2,896
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Jeez. Mine is-

    1- vacuum brake booster

    2- vacuum source for boost referenced PV and boost guage

    I like mine better.
    1983 Mustang G.T. No-option stripper- I like strippers.
    5.0, GT40P heads, Comp Cams XE270HR-12 on 1.6 rockers, TFI spring kit, Weiand 174 blower, Holley 750 mechanical secondarys, Mishimoto radiator, Edelbrock street performer mechanical pump, BBK shortys, T-5 conversion, 8.8 rear, 3.73 gears, carbon fiber clutches, SS Machine lowers, Maximum Motorsport XL subframes, "B" springs.

  20. #20
    FEP Super Member xctasy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Dunedin 9011, New Zealand, South Pacific
    Posts
    3,961

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brianj View Post
    Jeez. Mine is-

    1- vacuum brake booster

    2- vacuum source for boost referenced PV and boost guage

    I like mine better.
    BJ, I'd expect that from you. You add 100 pounds of panel steel to create a revolutionary Saleen esque Stripper Stang, then take off the 888 inches of emissions lines, and add a supercharger, and still end up lighter and probably, cleaner than a stock 83.


    Note a problem for CB, but any Hot fuel percolation is "hot fuel handling" in Aussie-speak. Ford Australia had the problem on file with the 82 XE Falcons, due to reduced grille area and the thermoplastic Carter carb bodies tendancy to heat sink on the iron intake manifild they used....but as the edict had gone out to kill engine production, Holden used the part on there Police special 333 pack 308 Commodores for the next few years. It was more fuel presure related, and a common problem compounded by the lack of info on Themoquad float level setting. .

    Ford US dealt with "hot fuel handling" in 1982 by using the US Trip Minder Ford bleed back valve for the fuel flow sensor in cop cars too.

    GM Holden used it, and HDT Brock Commodores used the system as a bleed-back on cars with as little as 195 and as much as 295 hp.

    In an Edelbrock world, where excessive gas line pressure or air en-trained fuel isn't dealt with so well, one of the same parts was available off the E6 Areostar 2.8 V6, it can be added to the inlet fuel line with a 27 thou bleed back restriction.

    Listed as a fuel regular or vapor kit. I can't find the reference to it just yet, its historically listed elseware and I'll have to check it.

    Other Holley or Mr Gasket or Malpassi units do the same thing, but you can also use it as a MPG message center input if you want to run it through your clock facade in the center console.

    Apparently, the similar looking Ford Aerostar 1986 vapor separator Assembly is usedas a fuel shut off esleware, and can be used as a bleed back.

    Part list is bottom right on this Pinto OHC page (old EAO engine from 70-89)

    I would have thought the Merkur XR4Ti or Scorpio would have had it too. They had TripMinder options too.

    Euro Part listing is 6097149 and 6161181 for the Fuel Flow Meter Assembly # 4 bottom right.

    http://www.fordopedia.org/parts-catalog/pinto-ohc/B5.14




    mrriggs was saying, any turbine wheel flow sensor will also be bleed back, so there is a way of making it yourself or by using propriety parts. Or Walkin-Talls method of fuel bleed back used on his 1984 3.8.

    And I gotta say it again, looks like Mikes is the simplest.

    Quote Originally Posted by Walking-Tall View Post
    I ended up having to also cut the tail off of Holley's throttle lever in order to clear the heat riser (blocked off) bolts anyways. Oh well, no sweat, carburetor return springs will hook onto the throttle lever's top.

    Today I tackled establishing different fuel and return lines for under the hood to connect to my bypass-return pressure-controlling contraption. The originals are nylon. It's a bit of a wrestling match to get the passenger side plastic inner fender out, but that's what's necessary, because the nylon fuel lines from under the hood connect to steel lines near to the bottom of the wheel well near the uni-body. I bent up two sections of 5/16" steel line, attached them with short pieces of fuel hose and stainless steel clamps. I added sleeves of fuel hose for where they bend and go through the passage to under-hood so they don't rub together or clatter around. Too bad the snazzy red zip-ties get hidden behind the plastic inner fender, lol




    The bypass-return contraption's in place alongside the passenger strut tower, ready for connection to more line to the schrader valve pressure-testing contraption, a fuel filter, and the carburetor.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •