Close



Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 55 of 55
  1. #51
    FEP Power Member Bruce Mohacsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    St.Albert, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,187

    Default

    Sorry guys. I'm late to the party. Doesn't anyone make a tubular arm with a spring perch designed to fit OE cars?

    Just a quick look on Summit's web site. AJE control arms.
    Name:  image.jpg
Views: 105
Size:  22.9 KB
    Last edited by Bruce Mohacsy; 08-03-2014 at 09:34 AM.

  2. #52
    Moderator wraithracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Grand Junction, CO/RR TX
    Posts
    14,214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Mohacsy View Post
    Sorry guys. I'm late to the party. Doesn't anyone make a tubular arm with a spring perch designed to fit OE cars?

    Just a quick look on Summit's web site. AJE control arms.
    Name:  image.jpg
Views: 105
Size:  22.9 KB
    IMHO there's little benefit to going to an aftermarket arm that still uses the OEM springs perch. The stock arms work just fine for that and if you are trying to improve the handling using the SN95 arms will give you the wider track width and improved camber curve. If you use the 99-04 control arms you have the better clearance and improved turning radius too. Obviously you can upgrade either OEM control arms in regards to bushings and if you are running the SN95 spindles then the OEM Ford ball joints are the best option too.

    The benefits to the tubular control arms is the weight reduction thanks to coil overs and then the benefits of coil overs compared to the OEM spring location. Obviously you can also get the forward offset control arms that improve the handling and lengthen the wheelbase of the car too, although for a street car that can require fender modifications for tire clearance with the forward offsets.

    Trey
    ​Trey

    "I Don't build it hoping for your approval! I built it because it meets mine!"

    "I've spent most of my money on Mustangs, racing, and women... the rest I just wasted."

    Mustangs Past: Too many to remember!
    Current Mustangs:
    1969 Mach 1
    1979 Pace Car now 5.0/5 speed
    1982 GT Stalled RestoModification
    1984 SVO Still Waiting Restoration
    1986 GT Under going Wide Body Conversion Currently

    Current Capris:
    1981 Capri Roller
    1981 Capri Black Magic Roller Basket Case
    1982 Capri RS 5.0/4spd T-top Full Restoration Stalled in TX
    1984 Capri RS T-top Roller
    1983-84 Gloy Racing Trans Am/IMSA Body Parts

  3. #53
    FEP Power Member Bruce Mohacsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    St.Albert, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,187

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wraithracing View Post
    IMHO there's little benefit to going to an aftermarket arm that still uses the OEM springs perch. The stock arms work just fine for that and if you are trying to improve the handling using the SN95 arms will give you the wider track width and improved camber curve. If you use the 99-04 control arms you have the better clearance and improved turning radius too. Obviously you can upgrade either OEM control arms in regards to bushings and if you are running the SN95 spindles then the OEM Ford ball joints are the best option too.

    The benefits to the tubular control arms is the weight reduction thanks to coil overs and then the benefits of coil overs compared to the OEM spring location. Obviously you can also get the forward offset control arms that improve the handling and lengthen the wheelbase of the car too, although for a street car that can require fender modifications for tire clearance with the forward offsets.

    Trey
    Are you saying that I could do a direct replacement of a-arms from a donor car? So if a guy was to find a donor at the bone yard, what year and model of mustang would he be looking for? A 99-04 V8 only or the 6cyl as well? And then do I just (just!) remove the lower control arms from the SN95 car and bolt them right onto my '82 GT? Right now my front end is apart just shy of the control arms so I might as well go all the way! (Remember, I have spindles and brakes from a '91)
    Bruce
    Last edited by Bruce Mohacsy; 08-05-2014 at 08:50 AM.

  4. #54

    Default

    SN95 control arms will move the wheels out a bit and get you some additional camber ability, but will make things fun if you have 'standard' Mustang offset wheels, the wider they are the more fun you will have. Also your 91 spindle won't fit the ball joint (IIRC), SN95 ball joints are a little shorter.

    If you have everything apart and are loosening the control arms anyway it would not hurt to pull them off and inspect the bushings. Bushings and old cars are a voodoo mystery, sometimes they are fine and look good, and sometimes they are completely trashed. The fronts on my car were nice and solid (yet I ripped them out anyway), the rears were totally gone.

  5. #55

    Default

    Just want to note the new FRPP A-arms Ford is selling may not be the same as the original FRPP A-arms. The blurbage for the new A-arms talk about a zerk fitting on the ball joints. The original FRPP A-arms has the long life ball joints which didn't have the zerk fitting. The blurbage doesn't mention the harder A-arm bushings either.
    Proud owner of the one and only Friggin' Futura

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •